Selection for qacA Carriage in CC22, but not CC30, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection Isolates During a Successful Institutional Infection Control Programme

Objectives The increasing use of chlorhexidine for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonisation raises concerns about reduced susceptibility. We evaluated the carriage of chlorhexidine resistance genes and chlorhexidine susceptibility in MRSA before and after introduction of an institutional MRSA control programme incorporating chlorhexidine-based decolonisation in 2004.

Methods MRSA bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates identified between 2001 and 2009 were tested for spa and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type and carriage of qacA, qacB and smr. Selected isolates were tested for chlorhexidine susceptibility. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between clone type, carriage of resistance genes and chlorhexidine susceptibility. Temporal trends in qacA or smr carriage were analysed using separate binomial generalised linear models.

Results Typing identified two dominant clones: CC22 (n = 224) and CC30 (n = 197). Annual MRSA BSI rates declined from 2004, although the rate of decline for CC22 was slower than for CC30. Carriage of qacA and smr and having a chlorhexidine MIC ≥2 mg/L did not increase overall amongst MRSA BSI isolates; however, qacA carriage increased in CC22 compared with in CC30 (OR, 7.21; 95% CI, 1.32–39.17). Furthermore, qacA+ CC22 isolates were more likely to have a chlorhexidine MIC ≥2 mg/L than qacA+ CC30 isolates (OR, 21.67; CI, 2.54–185.20).

Conclusions A successful infection control programme was associated with the selection of qacA linked with a higher chlorhexidine MIC in one dominant endemic MRSA clone (CC22), but not another (CC30). The slower reduction in the CC22 MRSA BSI rate suggests that carriage of qacA confers a selective advantage, with implications for the sustainability of decolonisation practice.